Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Arthur Zakirov
Тема Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Дата
Msg-id f65bee8c-34b8-178c-2ff2-28b2cfb7de4f@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Список pgsql-hackers
On 04.04.2017 15:41, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Sorry for late reply. Here is a new version of the patch, I rebased it and
> fixed those issues you've mentioned (pretty nasty problems, thank you for
> noticing).

Thank you!

I've looked at the patch again.

I'd like to focus on "refevalfunc" and "refnestedfunc" fields as I did 
earlier. I think using Oid type for them is a bad approach. "..._fetch" 
and "..._assign" functions in catalog is unnecessary movement to me. 
User of subscript of his type may think the same. But he won't see the 
code and won't know why he needs these functions.

And so "..._fetch" and "..._assign" functions in catalog is a bad design 
to me. But, of course, it is just my opinion. This approach is the main 
think which we should resolve first, because after commiting the patch 
it will be hard to fix it.

>  static int    ArrayCount(const char *str, int *dim, char typdelim);
> +bool isAssignmentIndirectionExpr(ExprState *exprstate);
>  static void ReadArrayStr(char *arrayStr, const char *origStr,

I think isAssignmentIndirectionExpr() here was forgoten to delete, 
because isAssignmentIndirectionExpr() is in execExpr.c now.

> +        if (subexpr == NULL)
> +        {
> +            lowerIndexpr = lappend(lowerIndexpr, subexpr);
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +

There is the extra line here after the brace.

>         if (array_type != sbsref->refcontainertype)
>         {
>
>             node = coerce_to_target_type(pstate,
>                                          node, array_type,
>                                          sbsref->refcontainertype, sbsref->reftypmod,
>                                          COERCION_ASSIGNMENT,
>                                          COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST,
>                                          -1);
>
>             /* can fail if we had int2vector/oidvector, but not for true domains */
>             if (node == NULL && node->type != 0)
>                 ereport(ERROR,
>                         (errcode(ERRCODE_CANNOT_COERCE),
>                          errmsg("cannot cast type %s to %s",
>                                 format_type_be(array_type),
>                                 format_type_be(sbsref->refcontainertype)),
>                          parser_errposition(pstate, 0)));
>
>             PG_RETURN_POINTER(node);
>         }

Also I was wondering do we need this code in array_subscript_parse()? I 
haven't understood the purpose of it. If it is necessary then would be 
good to add explain comment.

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Следующее
От: Anastasia Lubennikova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument