On 1/21/21 5:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jan-18, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On 1/17/21 7:39 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 9:48 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
>>>>> EQ Soft Consultoría y Soporte EIRL
>>>>> http://www.eqsoft.net/
>>>>> we cannot find evidence that it relates to postgresql in anyway
>>>>
>>>> I clicked into the website and found the owner listing experience with
>>>> PostgreSQL:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eqsoft.net/trabajo/requerimiento-de-personal-noviembre-2019/
>>>>
>>>
>>> that's not owner experience but looking for new people with those
>>> skills, anyway I'm not disputing the experience they have... and there
>>> was a time when they actually advertized that they provided postgresql
>>> services
>>>
>>> But what policy actually says is that "services must be related to
>>> PostgreSQL in some direct and obvious way" and that is not the case.
>>> Not that I'm completely happy with policy, maybe we need to look at it
>>> first before continuing with this exercise?
>>
>> The policy states "Further, the web site you link to in the listing must
>> somewhere mention PostgreSQL as an offered service or platform."[1]
>
> I read this policy as: it must be possible to find Postgres-related
> services by browsing the website starting from the published URL. In
> this case, a person looking for Postgres services browses their website,
> they won't find anywhere that they are offering PostgreSQL services.
>
> As Jaime said, the post you found just says they are looking to hire
> somebody with Postgres experience, which is definitely not the same as
> offering Postgres services. I do not think that merely having the word
> "Postgres" somewhere in the website is enough to qualify.
I would suggest reaching out to get some clarity, if this has not
already been done.
As mentioned upthread, given the range of organizations that can post
professional services, we try to ensure that they "check the boxes" of
what needs to be listed with passing limited judgment on the quality of
the content.
>>>>> Mondrian Tecnologia
>>>>> http://www.mondriantecnologia.com/
>>>>> when we originally tested the url, the website did not respond. Now it
>>>>> shows a banner saying is on maintenance, so maybe we should contact
>>>>> them or just wait some time and recheck.
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend contacting them in this case.
>>>>
>>> will do
>
> Website is back. There's no mention of Postgres anywhere, though the
> logo is an elephant. There is some "Lorem ipsum" content so we can wait
> a few days to see if they upload something relevant. I do not think
> that merely having an elephant as a logo is enough to qualify.
Yeah, skimming this, I think it should be removed. It seems to now fit
the profile of entries that do get rejected. I will go ahead and do so.
Thanks,
Jonathan