On 10/02/2016 09:50 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> It looks like we have some work to do to teach pg_dump about handling access
>> methods in extensions. This doesn't look quite as bad as the first issue,
>> but it's a pity 9.6 escaped into the wild with this issue.
> 562f06f3 has addressed this issue 3 months ago, and there is a test in
> src/test/modules/test_pg_dump.
So then why are the pre-upgrade and post-upgrade dumps different?
cheers
andrew