Re: Doubts about replication..
| От | Stefan Fercot |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Doubts about replication.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | f4a38417-dd3d-e621-79ff-bb6fe5e77d46@dalibo.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Doubts about replication.. (Edmundo Robles <edmundo@sw-argos.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
If you want to reduce the amount of data lost, you might want to consider another type of backup : https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html
That awsome tool can also help you with it : https://pgbackrest.org/
On 04/19/2018 08:48 PM, Edmundo Robles wrote:
Yes, you are right, the replication is not a backup ;) , actually i backup database daily at 3:00 am but if database crash, the amount of data is big! that is the reason i want to replicate to reduce the data loss. By the way a few days ago a job partner did a delete with no where.On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote:
Am 19.04.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Edmundo Robles:I will use replication as simple backup.
please keep in mind, replication is not a backup. All logical errors on the master (delete from table and forgot the where-condition) will replicated to the standby.
Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com--
Kind regards,
-- Stefan FERCOT http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: