Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Teodor Sigaev
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id f25a35a4-6e65-d126-8dfd-d88bb46da952@sigaev.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thanks for everyone, pushed with minor editorization


Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com 
> <mailto:sawada.mshk@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Korotkov
>     > So, I would like to clarify why could my patch block future improvements
>     > in this area?  For instance, if we would decide to make btree able to skip
>     > cleanup when some delete pages are pending for recycle, we can add
>     > it in future.
>     >
> 
>     Anyway, for approaches of this feature I agree your version patch and
>     your patch looks good to me as the first step of this feature.
> 
> 
> Agreed.  I think we got consensus that this patch is good first step,
> which doesn't block further enhancements in future.
> 
> So, I'm attaching rebased version of patch and marking this RFC.
> 
> ------
> Alexander Korotkov
> Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com/>
> The Russian Postgres Company

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables