Re: limit-offset different result sets with same query

2009/5/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>> Yeah, we went over this on the spanish list, turned out that I couldn't
>>> remember about syncscan :-)
>
>> I like the new behavior.  It really encourages proper use of order by,
>> because the natural ordering results are effectively randomized.  A
>> class of subtle bugs has been made obvious.  :)
>
> Not really, because the syncscan behavior only kicks in when your table
> gets large ... you'll never see it during devel testing on toy tables ...
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

Yeap. If you see one of the test i made, you'll see this switch over the
~100 regs.


--
      Emanuel Calvo Franco
        Sumate al ARPUG !
        ( www.arpug.com.ar)
    ArPUG / AOSUG Member