Re: security_definer_search_path GUC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joel Jacobson
Тема Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Дата
Msg-id f0637f04-494a-460d-9cea-cf48c22cf24a@www.fastmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 23:26, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 1:55 PM Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> wrote:

If we don't like "UNQUALIFIED" as a keyword, maybe we could reuse "PUBLIC"?
Or will that be confusing since "PUBLIC" is also a role_specification?


For me the concept resembles explicitly denoting certain schemas as being simple tags, while the actual "namespace" is the GLOBAL namespace.  Today there is no global namespace, all schemas generate their own individual namespace in addition to "tagging" their objects with a textual label.


Avoiding "public" is highly desirable.

To access a global object you should be able to still specify its schema tag.  Unqualified means "use search_path"; and "use search_path" includes global.  But there is a truth table waiting to be created to detail what combinations result in errors (including where those errors occur - runtime or creation time).

+1

/Joel

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuro Yamada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate history file?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Misplaced superuser check in pg_log_backend_memory_contexts()