Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?
От
Mischa Sandberg
Тема
Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?
Дата
Msg-id
esVWc.44164$jZ5.31613@clgrps13
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Mischa Sandberg <mischa.sandberg@telus.net>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? "J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? "J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX? Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>
Coming from the MSSQL world, I'm used to the first step in optimization to be, choose your clustered index and choose it well. I see that PG has a one-shot CLUSTER command, but doesn't support continuously-updated clustered indexes. What I infer from newsgroup browsing is, such an index is impossible, given the MVCC versioning of records (happy to learn I'm wrong). I'd be curious to know what other people, who've crossed this same bridge from MSSQL or Oracle or Sybase to PG, have devised, faced with the same kind of desired performance gain for retrieving blocks of rows with the same partial key.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
