Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
Дата
Msg-id emacs-smtp-20243-13591-57644-936428@export.andrew.cmu.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
Список pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Speaking of data type removal, I was wondering if there were a better
way to handle arrays of types.  From looking in the catalog, it
appears that for each type, there is also declared a similar type,
which is the array version.  It seems that arrays should be considered
more flags on a field, than a field type in themselves.  Does this
make sense to anybody else?

- --
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia.      |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance??    |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek@andrew.cmu.edu for my public key.                     |
=====================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBNRfhLIdzVnzma+gdAQGUvwH8CWMmMo633do81jgZd+pPPJPW481nfwB9
awec8H9PjZ3QsShK4cSIJmC9Yg+IMBp3E+goHYssAO4X42Nf15+0EA==
=8YSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.