Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrey Lepikhov
Тема Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)
Дата
Msg-id efb33bee-145d-95a8-1048-2e7b8f282e2c@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 23/2/2023 11:36, Richard Guo wrote:
> I've realized this hack is not correct :-(.  References to A Vars and B
> Vars in higher qual levels do not need this adjustment.  So this code
> change would add unnecessary relids for clauses that involve A Vars or B
> Vars but not C Vars, resulting them being placed at higher place than
> needed.
> 
> Maybe what we need is to add in commute_below_l (assuming it has been
> recorded in SpecialJoinInfo) rather than commute_below of outer joins
> mentioned within the clause?
Doing a comparison of pg15 and master initsplan.c I found that a clear 
and documented algorithm for delaying the application of a qual is lost 
or replaced with some commute_* fields.
It is not clear how we guarantee correct application delay of a qual. 
Which part of the code implements it now?

-- 
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional




В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17744: Fail Assert while recoverying from pg_basebackup
Следующее
От: Richard Guo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)