Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | efb1b9f6-99d6-43f4-8ef1-f9b046db2f80@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/2/24 09:48, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:03 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM Jacob Champion >> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> > Would it provide enough value for effort to explicitly mark leaky >> > procedures as such? Maybe that could shrink the grey area enough to be >> > protective? >> >> You mean like proleakproof = true/false/maybe? > > Yeah, exactly. <dons flameproof suit> Hmmm, and then have "leakproof_mode" = strict/lax/off where 'strict' is current behavior, 'lax' allows the 'maybe's to get pushed down, and 'off' ignores the leakproof attribute entirely and pushes down anything that merits being pushed? </dons flameproof suit> -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: