Re: missing support of named convention for procedures

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
Дата
Msg-id ef1fdaff-22d7-91ca-03c1-4bddec49afc3@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: missing support of named convention for procedures  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: missing support of named convention for procedures  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/16/18 06:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> attached patch fixes it

The fix doesn't seem to work for LANGUAGE SQL procedures.  For example:

CREATE PROCEDURE ptest5(a int, b int DEFAULT 0)
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (a, 'foo');
INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (b, 'bar');
$$;
CALL ptest5(a => 1, b => 2);  -- ok
CALL ptest5(b => 3, a => 4);  -- ok
CALL ptest5(5);
ERROR:  no value found for parameter 2
CONTEXT:  SQL function "ptest5" statement 2
CALL ptest5(a => 6);
ERROR:  no value found for parameter 2
CONTEXT:  SQL function "ptest5" statement 2

I'm not quite sure why this behaves differently from plpgsql.  Needs
more digging.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michail Nikolaev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [WIP PATCH] Index scan offset optimisation using visibility map
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort