Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: missing support of named convention for procedures |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ef1fdaff-22d7-91ca-03c1-4bddec49afc3@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: missing support of named convention for procedures (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/16/18 06:29, Pavel Stehule wrote: > attached patch fixes it The fix doesn't seem to work for LANGUAGE SQL procedures. For example: CREATE PROCEDURE ptest5(a int, b int DEFAULT 0) LANGUAGE SQL AS $$ INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (a, 'foo'); INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (b, 'bar'); $$; CALL ptest5(a => 1, b => 2); -- ok CALL ptest5(b => 3, a => 4); -- ok CALL ptest5(5); ERROR: no value found for parameter 2 CONTEXT: SQL function "ptest5" statement 2 CALL ptest5(a => 6); ERROR: no value found for parameter 2 CONTEXT: SQL function "ptest5" statement 2 I'm not quite sure why this behaves differently from plpgsql. Needs more digging. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: