Re: SQL:2011 application time

On 05.09.24 14:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 07.08.24 22:54, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> Here are some fixes based on outstanding feedback (some old some new). 
> 
> I have studied your patches v39-0001 through v39-0004, which correspond 
> to what had been reverted plus the new empty range check plus various 
> minor fixes.  This looks good to me now, so I propose to go ahead with 
> that.
> 
> Btw., in your 0003 you point out that this prevents using the WITHOUT 
> OVERLAPS functionality for non-range types.  But I think this could be 
> accomplished by adding an "is empty" callback as a support function or 
> something like that.  I'm not suggesting to do that here, but it might 
> be worth leaving a comment about that possibility.

I have committed these, as explained here.

I look forward to an updated patch set from you to review the "FOR 
PORTION OF" patches next.