On 2/15/17 11:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So I would like to have a background worker limit per user, as you
> allude to. Attached is a patch that implements a GUC setting
> max_worker_processes_per_user.
>
> Besides the uses for background sessions, but it can also be useful for
> parallel workers, logical replication apply workers, or things like
> third-party partitioning extensions.
Given that background sessions have been postponed, is there still
interest in this separate from that? It would be useful for per-user
parallel worker limits, for example.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services