On 4/11/19 1:45 AM, 김준형 wrote:
>
> 1. It spends more resources but I think this setting endure that problem.
> Actually, after this setting, Windows server(include PostgreSQL server)
> endures that problem more.
> But I know it's not a solution.
>
> 2. No. MS-SQL SERVER, PostgreSQL Server, and Tomcat.
> What do you think of appropriate value of max_wal_size?
Have no idea, mostly because the root cause of your issue has not been
established.
>
> 3. I'll check these links until next weekend.
> Maybe I'll spend long time to adapt this suggestions.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com