Tom Lane wrote on 5/4/2022 5:32 PM:Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
On 28.04.22 18:50, Przemysław Sztoch wrote:
Current unnaccent dictionary does not include many popular numeric symbols,
in example: "m²" -> "m2"
Seems reasonable.
It kinda feels like this is outside the charter of an "unaccent"
dictionary. I don't object to having these conversions available
but it seems like it ought to be a separate feature.
regards, tom lane
Tom, I disagree with you because many similar numerical conversions are already taking place, e.g.
1/2, 1/4...
Today Unicode is ubiquitous and we use a lot more weird characters.
I just completed these less common characters.
Therefore, the problem of missing characters in unaccent.rules affects the correct operation of the FTS mechanisms.
--
Przemysław Sztoch | Mobile +48 509 99 00 66