Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix
От | Jim Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ee3a0d8b-d24c-4f4c-b644-ff25a4004c13@uni-muenster.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Greg On 11.07.24 18:09, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Thanks for the review. Please find attached a new version with proper > tabs and indenting. > > Cheers, > Greg > I'm testing this new log prefix and I'm wondering whether the following behaviour is expected. The value of '%L' is different in the following cases: postgres=# SHOW log_line_prefix; log_line_prefix ----------------- %m [%p] -> %L (1 row) -- postgres=# SELECT 1/0; 2024-11-18 16:00:42.720 CET [3135117] -> 192.168.178.27 ERROR: division by zero 2024-11-18 16:00:42.720 CET [3135117] -> 192.168.178.27 STATEMENT: SELECT 1/0; -- postgres=# SELECT pg_reload_conf(); 2024-11-18 16:01:23.273 CET [3114980] -> [local] LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files -- postgres=# CHECKPOINT; 2024-11-18 16:01:46.758 CET [3114981] -> [local] LOG: checkpoint starting: immediate force wait 2024-11-18 16:01:46.769 CET [3114981] -> [local] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 0 buffers (0.0%), wrote 0 SLRU buffers; 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0 recycled; write=0.001 s, sync=0.001 s, total=0.012 s; sync files=0, longest=0.000 s, average=0.000 s; distance=0 kB, estimate=25924 kB; lsn=0/26166430, redo lsn=0/261663D8 Is it supposed to be like this? Thanks for the patch! -- Jim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: