Re: About inheritance
| От | Diogo Biazus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: About inheritance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | eca519a104063010245d4acd0d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: About inheritance (Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: About inheritance
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
And how about just saying something in the docs like: deprecated ? Or let the code and rip off just the docs about inheritance. On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:53:53 +0200, Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com> wrote: > > elein wrote: > > I strongly suggest a more cautious approach than "ripping > > things out." Ripping out time travel got us row space > > but lost point in time recovery. And is pushing us to > > implement more traditionally logging. It was an OK trade > > in the long run, but it took us a long time to get around to pitr. > > > The approach could perhaps be as simple as changing the terminology.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: