Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates
От
Heikki Linnakangas
Тема
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates
Дата
Msg-id
ec1e7a22-efc9-3472-7c05-664baba0935c@iki.fi
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
On 20/01/2021 17:25, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> Pushed as commit 6b4d3046f4, and backpatched down to version 12, where >> this bug was introduced. It will appear in the next minor release. > > I see you noted that REINDEX is required to repair any corrupted indexes. > For the purposes of the release notes, can we characterize which indexes > might be affected, or do we just have to say "better reindex all GIST > indexes"? Any GiST index that's been concurrently inserted might be corrupt. Better reindex all GiST indexes. - Heikki P.S. The GiST amcheck extension that's been discussed at [1] would catch this corruption, so if that was already committed, we could suggest using it. But that doesn't help us now. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3eApa07-BajjG8+RYx-Dr_cq28ZA0GsZmUQrGu5b2ayRhB5A@mail.gmail.com would catch this corruption
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата: