Re: [HACKERS] generated columns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] generated columns
Дата
Msg-id eba539b8-9d15-a708-1702-c3271c30ad52@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] generated columns  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] generated columns  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06/11/2018 14:28, Simon Riggs wrote:
>     The simplest solution would be to exclude generated columns from the
>     replication stream altogether.
> 
> 
> IMHO...
> 
> Virtual generated columns need not be WAL-logged, or sent.

right

> Stored generated columns should be treated just like we'd treat a column
> value added by a trigger.
> 
> e.g. if we had a Timestamp column called LastUpdateTimestamp we would
> want to send that value

Generated columns cannot have volatile expression results in them, so
this case cannot happen.

Also, we don't know whether the generation expression on the target is
the same (or even if it looks the same, consider locale issues etc.), so
we need to recompute the generated columns on the target anyway, so it's
pointless to send the already computed stored values.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally
Следующее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disallow setting client_min_messages > ERROR?