Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | eb076b15-64b5-4992-b232-9e00603e0849@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.02.24 08:20, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:47 PM Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 0001 fixes compression inheritance >> 0002 fixes storage inheritance >> > > The first patch does not update compression_1.out which makes CI > unhappy. Here's patchset fixing that. The changed behavior looks good to me. The tests are good, the code changes are pretty straightforward. Did you by any change check that pg_dump dumps the resulting structures correctly? I notice in tablecmds.c that ALTER COLUMN SET STORAGE recurses but ALTER COLUMN SET COMPRESSION does not. I don't understand why that is, and I wonder whether it affects pg_dump.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: