Re: famous multi-process architectures
| От | Greg Sabino Mullane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: famous multi-process architectures | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | eab742367170e8229607155f598d77bf@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | famous multi-process architectures (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: famous multi-process architectures
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-advocacy | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > "Google got inspired by Postgres: they use the same > multi-process architecture for their browser as Postgres > already features for many years. Simply because it > provides better crash-safety than threaded applications." That's a heck of a stretch to say they were "inspired" by Postgres. A multi-process model is hardly a unique development of Postgres, and it's not like we don't still have crash problems: "process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory" "terminating connection because of crash of another server process" I suspect Chrome doesn't have the same shared memory requirements that a database does, of course. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809041014 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAki/7dUACgkQvJuQZxSWSshiAACg6cYg8GkpoNmTIV1/edxEdB0p AkUAn2HMQPntdqjQARWA4Z9pKef7aPwj =mpK2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: