Re: Some restructuring of the download section
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ea6bcf99f1f67bfe3a1cf20e6004c1b0@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some restructuring of the download section (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some restructuring of the download section
Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:44:24 +0800, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: >>> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Magnus Hagander >>> > <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> >> Uh, that part is just incorrect. Several sets of platform packages >>> >> certainly do initdb for you. And AFAIK every single one of them on >>> >> Linux at least do service setup for you. >>> >>> > Hmm, clearly it's been a while since I did a PG installation on Debian >>> > (oddly!), as that does seem to leave the server up and running. I'm >>> > fairly certain it didn't in the past. >>> > RPMs on the other hand, do not. >>> >>> FWIW, Red-Hat-based systems have a strong distro policy against starting >>> servers merely because the package got installed --- the theory is that >>> an "everything" install should not leave the user running a bunch of >>> servers he doesn't know about and maybe hasn't configured securely. >>> >>> I'm a bit surprised to hear that Debian does it differently; although >>> it's possible that they distinguish manual from automatic install >>> scenarios. It's a little bit saner to do an auto service start if you >>> know that the user explicitly requested this specific package. >>> >> >> When you use aptitude or apt-get to install the server package, it will >> install the binaires, execute initdb, and start the server. I much >> prefer the RPM way of doing it (IOW, not starting the server). Anyway, I >> guess there are both pros and cons in both methods. > > Yeah. But it's a good point that since they are different, I should > add info to each of the pages saying exactly how it behaves on that > specific platform. I'm not sure this is really our responsibility. The package maintainer should have a webpage explaining how his packages work. -- Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: