On Tue, 2025-12-02 at 15:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the other hand ... is that comment really right about zero-length
> match being possible? If it is, the API for this function is in
> need of redesign, because callers that try to find "the next match"
> would go into an infinite loop re-finding the same zero-length
> match over and over.
I know too little about exotic collations to answer that, but it sure
would be a problem. All I find in the discussion is the claim by
Peter E. in [1] that it is so. Perhaps he can enlighten us.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
[1]: https://postgr.es/m/6107daa2-5cf7-4cf2-a526-626be1d15b18%40eisentraut.org