Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
| От | Petr Jelinek |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/04/2020 16:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started >> as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report >> bogus info (as in some code that's executed will look as not executed). > > Hm, really? I routinely run "make check" (ie, parallel regression > tests) under coverage, and I get results that seem sane. If I were > losing large chunks of the data, I think I'd have noticed. > Parallel regression still just starts single postgres instance no? -- Petr Jelinek 2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: