database contest in c't (German IT magazine)
От | Markus Schiltknecht |
---|---|
Тема | database contest in c't (German IT magazine) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e6kcvd$1std$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: database contest in c't (German IT magazine)
(Michael Dean <mdean@sourceview.com>)
Re: database contest in c't (German IT magazine) (Michael Dean <mdean@sourceview.com>) Re: database contest in c't (German IT magazine) (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) Re: database contest in c't (German IT magazine) (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) Re: database contest in c't (German IT magazine) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi, in the current edition of the german computer magazine c't the results of the database contest, which they announced last year, has finally been published. It was based on a very simple DVD-Store web application from Dell. [1] Back then I spent some time modifying the original php5 application to use PostgreSQL. I've written some stored procedures in C and optimized the schema at obvious places. I've been short on time, though, and couldn't do everything I wished to do. Most importantly connection pooling didn't seem to make it into the final entry I have submitted. :-( That might be one reason for the disappointing performance result: last place, just before the disqualified entries. The performance trophy (once again) has gone to the MySQL Benchmark Team... [2] With that result I fear I did a disservice to PostgreSQL. Once again it seems to be just slower than MySQL. I'm sorry for that. Especially because other strengths of PostgreSQL didn't get mentioned. OTOH I at least hacked up something. My entry was the only counting one using PostgreSQL - which is surprising and disappointing me. (The only other PosgreSQL entry from Alvar C.H. Freude unfortunately got disqualified because it was sent in too late [3]). Didn't the PostgreSQL community know about that contest? IMHO it would have been worthwhile to start a community project and submit an entry. Just to get rid of that 'too-slow'-image PostgreSQL still has. At least I have learned: next time I'll try to start a community project for such a contest! Regards Markus [1]: Read more about it on http://www.ctmagazin.de/dbcontest (german, there are english translations of the contest rules... somewhere...) [2]: My solution (PHP5/PostgreSQL 8.1) got 120 opm (operations per minute? Dunno anymore what that meant exactly), the best PHP5/MySQL solution got 3664 opm. Another interesting one (IMO) was MonetDB with 1833 opm. The Java/DB2 Express one got 1537 opm, Java/Oracle 10g Express 1412 opm... [3]: I'm quite sure Alvar's entry would have performed much better than mine. AFAICT he has written a quite well optimized apache/mod_perl/pgsql solution.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: