Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term
Дата
Msg-id
e6ab8f48-c4d3-4049-8697-9d46b6e19c9f@eisentraut.org
Ответ на
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term (Richard Guo)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: BUG #18252: Assert in CheckOpSlotCompatibility() fails when recursive union filters tuples in non-recursive term Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
On 19.12.23 12:28, Richard Guo wrote: > BTW, while reading the codes, I noticed two typos in simplehash.h, one > is in the comment of SH_INSERT, the other is in the comment of > SH_INSERT_HASH. Attached is a trivial patch for that. /* - * Insert the key key into the hash-table, set *found to true if the key - * already exists, false otherwise. Returns the hash-table entry in either - * case. + * Insert the key into the hash-table, set *found to true if the key already + * exists, false otherwise. Returns the hash-table entry in either case. */ SH_SCOPE SH_ELEMENT_TYPE * SH_INSERT(SH_TYPE * tb, SH_KEY_TYPE key, bool *found) I suppose the original intention might have been "Insert the key passed in the parameter named key ..." or "Insert the key `key` ..." or something like that. But even if so, that's clearly confusing, so I am in favor of your patch, just pointing this out in case someone wants to protest.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: tender wang
Дата:
От: tender wang
Дата: