Thanks a lot for the advice Richard. I will try those things out and
report back to the list.
Carl
On 8/10/06, Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
> From your figures, you're allocating about 64MB to work_mem, which is
> per sort. So, a complex query could use several times that amount. If
> you don't have many concurrent queries that might be what you want.
>
> Also, you've allocated 1GB to your shared_buffers which is more than I'd
> use as a starting point.
>
> You've only mentioned one main table with 100,000 rows, so presumably
> you're going to cache the entire DB in RAM. So, you'll want to increase
> effective_cache_size and reduce random_page_cost.