Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Дата
Msg-id e5538639-c232-e631-c533-aa6449b8ba09@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2021-01-19 01:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thank you for the information. The only reason for sharing the same
> variable for both file and directory is to avoid additional variable
> only for this reason. I'll post a new version where new GUC
> ssl_crl_path is added.

Okay, I look forward to that patch.

> By the way we can do the same thing on CA file/dir, but I personally
> think that the benefit from the specify-by-directory for CA files is
> far less than CRL files. So I'm not going to do this for CA files for
> now.

Yeah, that seems not so commonly used.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: yuzuko
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Release SPI plans for referential integrity with DISCARD ALL
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: popcount