On 3/31/06, Kai Hessing <kai.hessing@hobsons.de> wrote:
> The second one (UPDATE xyz WHERE id IN (xyz1, xyz2, ....) AND
> status>-1;) returns:
> ------------------
> Seq Scan on phon (cost=0.00..1573304.58 rows=105931 width=148) (actual
> time=369563.565..369563.565 rows=0 loops=1)
Just a shot in the dark: does the plan stay the same,
when you remove the ' AND status > -1' ?
--
marko