Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property.
| От | Toru SHIMOGAKI | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property. | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e43b8e4f0804111727j535b62e3i4e356295b19b0023@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property. (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property. | 
| Список | pgsql-jdbc | 
2008/4/11, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>:
>   I don't see a danger with exposing them as options as long as the pros and
> cons are clearly explained.
How about the following list to compare keepalive and socket timeout?
Please add other topics, if any.
                 keepalive                 socket timeout
------------------------------------------------------------------
Configurability  No in Java                Yes
                 (depend on OS setting)
Target           All connections           Each connection
Standard timer   2 hours                   Depend on users
 setting
Influence        All of applications       Long running query
                 on a same OS              using a same connection
Overhead         Network for               CPU for timer
                 keepalive proves
On the other hand, should we  provide the both properties and users
chose either of them depend on their requirement?
--
Toru SHIMOGAKI <shimogaki.toru@gmail.com>
		
	В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: