On 4/5/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
[...]
> If I am wrong and it's better to leave libxml2-free capabilities, then IMHO
> we need to reflect it explicitly in the docs, what requires libxml2, and
> what doesn't
Agreed, let's do the later and update the documentation.
So, you are agreed that I am wrong :-) Well... I would be happy hear some arguments, but I cannot insist on it :-)
Also, do we
output a helpful message if someone tries to use a libxml2 function that
isn't available.
Yep, here it is:
INSERT INTO xmltest VALUES (1, '<value>one</value>');
ERROR: no XML support in this installation
I suppose we should change it to "no libxml2 support in this installation", shouldn't we?
--
Best regards,
Nikolay