Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery
| От | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e431ff4c0612181515v7a7deea2pedd28f0a3c572012@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | No error when FROM is missing in subquery ("Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery | 
| Список | pgsql-bugs | 
ok, sorry, I've realized that it's yet another example of "outer reference", Tom will say "read any SQL book" again :-) http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00115.php On 12/19/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com> wrote: > Following query is considered as correct, no "missing from" error has > been reported (so, entire table will be updated and "on update" > triggers will be fired for every row): > > update item set obj_id = obj_id > where obj_id in (select obj_id where item_point is null order by > obj_modified limit 10) > > Is it a bug? If no, maybe to produce warning in such cases? > > -- > Best regards, > Nikolay > -- Best regards, Nikolay
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: