On 01/09/2018 10:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Generally speaking, Postgres tries hard to be an extensible-datatype
> system, going beyond the SQL standard's minimum requirements when
> necessary to make it so. The reason that we don't already have RANGE
> PRECEDING/FOLLOWING support is that nobody was satisfied with only
> making it work for integers and datetimes. There was, as I recall, code
> implementing more or less what you've got here in the original window
> function submission, and we pulled it out before committing because of
> that inadequacy. I don't think the fact that some years have gone by
> means that we should forget about keeping the feature extensible.
I'm glad I read the thread before I replied. My biggest complaint I had
in my head when reading the initial post was that clamping down on
specific datatypes was distinctly non-PostgreSQL-esque.
I'm -1 on such a patch, even though I would really like this feature.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support