Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
| От | Hannes Dorbath |
|---|---|
| Тема | Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e3pmkc$12mk$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I've just had some discussion with colleagues regarding the usage of hardware or software raid 1/10 for our linux based database servers. I myself can't see much reason to spend $500 on high end controller cards for a simple Raid 1. Any arguments pro or contra would be desirable. From my experience and what I've read here: + Hardware Raids might be a bit easier to manage, if you never spend a few hours to learn Software Raid Tools. + There are situations in which Software Raids are faster, as CPU power has advanced dramatically in the last years and even high end controller cards cannot keep up with that. + Using SATA drives is always a bit of risk, as some drives are lying about whether they are caching or not. + Using hardware controllers, the array becomes locked to a particular vendor. You can't switch controller vendors as the array meta information is stored proprietary. In case the Raid is broken to a level the controller can't recover automatically this might complicate manual recovery by specialists. + Even battery backed controllers can't guarantee that data written to the drives is consistent after a power outage, neither that the drive does not corrupt something during the involuntary shutdown / power irregularities. (This is theoretical as any server will be UPS backed) -- Regards, Hannes Dorbath
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: