On 07.12.25 20:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, this only fixes the one use-case. Admittedly we have only one
> use-case, but as soon as we have another we'll have a new problem.
> How about instead modifying the macro? Maybe something like this
> in c.h (untested):
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> #undef typeof
> #define typeof decltype
> #define HAVE_TYPEOF 1
> #endif
AFAICT, both gcc and clang support typeof in C++ mode as well. So this
kind of renaming could be confusing.