Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties
От
Hitoshi Harada
Тема
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties
Дата
Msg-id
e08cc0400810281023k157681d0p4d44a7cfeedac033@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "David Rowley" <dgrowley@gmail.com>
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
2008/10/29 Tom Lane : > "Hitoshi Harada" writes: >> Can "ROWS" be reserved_keyword? > >> In window specifications, we have > >> OVER (ORDER BY expr_list [(ROWS|RANGE) ... ]) > >> and currently "ROWS" is not reserved so bison is confused with cases >> of "ROWS" included in expr_list and in FRAME clause. Because there is >> no delimiter between ORDER BY clause and FRAME (that is (ROWS | >> RANGE)) clause, "ROWS" can be in expr_list as a_expr. > > Right offhand, I don't see any alternative but to make both ROWS and > RANGE reserved. It's pretty annoying since that might break existing > applications that have been using these as identifiers, but the SQL > committee seems to care little about that :-( > > BTW, finding this sort of problem is exactly why ignoring shift/reduce > conflicts is a bad idea. You would've ended up with unexpected > behaviors given the wrong input. > I see it now. This is so good study to me, though it spent me much time. Thanks anyway. Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления