Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
| От | Andrus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dlvpuh$7fi$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1 ("Andrus Moor" <eetasoft@online.ee>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1 |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Jim, > Keep in mind that if analyze has never been run on a table the database > will assume 1000 rows, which is definately off from 122 rows. autovacuum processes this tabele regularly. I believed that autovacuum can update the row count to be real. > You might want to ask on the pgAdmin list. Though I'd recommend against > calling the guru 'stupid' over there. :) I'm creating application which upsizes existing data to new postgres 8.1 database. Will I need to run VACUUM ANALYZE after upsizing ? Must I enable statitics collection for this database ? Andrus.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: