Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c

"Mark Kirkwood" <markir@paradise.net.nz> wrote
> In two of the sections covered by #ifdef WAL_DEBUG there are declarations 
> like:
>
> char        buf[8192];
>
> It seems to me that these should be:
>
> char        buf[BLCKSZ];
>

Those two 8192 have nothing to do with BLCKSZ, it is just an arbitrary 
buffer size as long as it is big enough to hold debug information.

Regards,
Qingqing