Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dfybm6iyxcsq3kuwx2xpv2thjh2fwkuy4vxbzahb7ntrtuo3ex@gvg2zqsx3d5d обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-02-24 15:48:13 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 15:41, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> > I notice that 001_server.pl contains this:
> >
> > if ($ENV{with_python} ne 'yes')
> > {
> > plan skip_all => 'OAuth tests require --with-python to run';
> > }
> >
> > and various other things that insist on this. But I think all we should need is for Python to be present, whether
ornot we are building plpython.
>
> Agreed. Right now the --with-python check is what runs PGAC_PATH_PYTHON but
> maybe there is value in separating this going forward into a) have python; b)
> have python and build plpython?
FWIW, For other things we need in tests, e.g. gzip, we don't actually use a
configure test. I think we could do the same for the python commandline
binary.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: