Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vik Fearing
Тема Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0
Дата
Msg-id deb5b865-25de-b894-2d3d-44470eb86a88@postgresfriends.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 12/16/22 18:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
>> This query:
> 
>> WITH RECURSIVE
> 
>> run(x, y) AS (
>>    SELECT 0, 0
>>    UNION ALL
>>    SELECT x, y FROM run AS r WHERE r.is_cycle
>> )
>> CYCLE x, y SET is_cycle USING path
> 
>> TABLE run
>> ;
> 
>> in which I mistakenly tried to access the is_cycle column from inside the
>> wle, provokes the following error:
> 
>> ERROR:  XX000: cache lookup failed for type 0
>> LOCATION:  typeOrDomainTypeRelid, parse_type.c:699
> 
> Yeah.  We are calling addRangeTableEntryForCTE inside parse analysis of
> the CTE's query, and it's generating a ParseNamespaceItem with p_vartype = 0
> because analyzeCTE hasn't yet identified the cycle_mark_type.  That
> eventually results in a Var with vartype 0, confusing later parse analysis.
> 
> It looks to me like we can just move that part of the code up to before
> we recurse to parse_sub_analyze, though.  AFAICS, identification of the
> cycle column type needn't (and had better not) depend on any
> characteristics of the CTE's query.

Indeed, it should only depend on the TO and DEFAULT subclauses (not 
shown here).

Thanks for the fix!
-- 
Vik Fearing




В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)