Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Дата
Msg-id dea96b6b-95c5-60e4-ae3a-f4b4c45701c1@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Alexander,

On 06/01/2018 04:22 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Hi, James!
> 
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:10 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com
> <mailto:jtc331@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I've attached an updated copy of the patch that applies cleanly to
>     current master.
> 
> 
> Thank you for rebasing this patch.  Next time sending a patch,
> please make sure you've bumped its version, if even you made no
> changes there besides to pure rebase. Otherwise, it would be hard to
> distinguish patch versions, because patch files have exactly same
> names.
> 
> I'd like to note, that I'm going to provide revised version of this 
> patch to the next commitfest. After some conversations at PGCon
> regarding this patch, I got more confident that providing separate
> paths for incremental sorts is right.  In the next revision of this
> patch, incremental sort paths would be provided in more cases.
> 

Do you plan to submit an updated patch version for the November CF? It
would be good to look at the costing model soon, otherwise it might end
up missing PG12, and that would be unfortunate.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Conflicting option checking in pg_restore