Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function
| От | Viktor Holmberg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | de89bd5c-9f51-4891-8a38-d03ed06ebd1d@Spark обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
I haven’t checked the source code, but yes the isn_weak feature has some footgun potential. As it doesn’t respect transactions, but rather sets a flag on session level, it’s easy for the “isn weakness” to leak out into a connection pool.
Still the feature is very useful as I work with many suppliers who give us product lists full of invalid EANs, which still need to be ingested.
Still the feature is very useful as I work with many suppliers who give us product lists full of invalid EANs, which still need to be ingested.
/Viktor
On 14 Mar 2025 at 14:16 +0000, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:On 14 Mar 2025, at 12:49, Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net> wrote:The isn_weak function in the isn extension reports the wrong value if you look at it inside a transaction:I wonder if this should really be marked VOLATILE instead as it has a side
effect.
Indeed. This whole area seems really poorly considered. The comment
in isn--1.1.sql says
-- isn_weak(boolean) - Sets the weak input mode.
-- This function is intended for testing use only!
despite which it's documented at length in isn.sgml. On the other
hand, so far as I can find it's tested nowhere, which means none
of the "weak mode" code is getting exercised.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: