Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE
Дата
Msg-id dd4e9a4c8e7e6d2960f77f8dd509ccced332f907.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 21:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Or possibly casting the whole thing to int or unsigned int would be
> better.  Point being that I bet it's int vs long that is making the
> difference.

That did it, and it's much more tolerable as a workaround. Thank you.

I haven't tested end-to-end that it solves the problem, but I'm pretty
sure it will.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks