Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Дата
Msg-id
dd48e765-9afe-4695-b2f4-f3cc0c1218e0@2ndQuadrant.com
Ответ на
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep.thakkar@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep.thakkar@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep.thakkar@enterprisedb.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 08/15/2018 12:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > >> Personally, I'd prefer to >> continue avoiding // comments and intermingled declarations of >> variables and code on grounds of style and readability. > ... which I agree with. > > A decade or so ago I would have strongly agreed with you. But the language trend seems to be in the other direction. And there is something to be said for declaration near use without having to use an inner block. I'm not advocating that we change policy, however. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления