Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcc563d10908201832u85305ebg93d014e355a34f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation (Slava Moudry <smoudry@4info.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
2009/8/20 Slava Moudry <smoudry@4info.net>: > Hi, > Yes, I thought about putting the bit-flags in separate fields. > Unfortunately - I expect to have quite a lot of these and space is an issue when you are dealing with billions of recordsin fact table, so I prefer to pack them into one int8. For giggles I created two test tables, one with a single int, one with 8 bools, and put 100M entries in each. The table with 8 bools took up aprrox. 3560616 bytes, while the one with a single int took up approx. 3544212 I.e they're about the same. You should really test to see if having a lot of bools costs more than mangling ints around. I'm guessing I could fit a lot more bools in the test table due to alignment issues than just 8.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: