Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records
Дата
Msg-id dcc563d10908051027g11b213dbkdfdc85fe0b74fea@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
Ответы Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records
Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Csaba Nagy<nagy@ecircle-ag.com> wrote:
> Hi Andor,
>
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:15 +0200, Schindler Andor wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the end, then
>> it decreases, but 11 remains the same. The problem only occurs, when the
>> where condition contains "sorrend > 9" or less.
>
> I bet the "sorrend" column is of some text type, and the "sorrend > 9"
> comparison is a text comparison. Try "sorrend::integer > 9" and it
> should work ;-)

That's kinda what I was thinking at first, but the pastebin he posted
showed them in proper int type order.  So I'm not sure why it's doing
what it's doing.  I'd ask Schinlder if he could post a completely self
contained example of the problem, including the create table and
insert statements used to create the test set.  Otherwise we're blind
men describing an elephant.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Gould
Дата:
Сообщение: LDAP using Active Directory
Следующее
От: Sam Mason
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records