On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Andrus <kobruleht2@hot.ee> wrote:
>> it was veery fast. To be honest I do not know what is happening?!
>
> This is really weird.
> It seems that PostgreSql OFFSET / LIMIT are not optimized and thus typical
> paging queries
And how exactly should it be optimized? If a query is even moderately
interesting, with a few joins and a where clause, postgresql HAS to
create the rows that come before your offset in order to assure that
it's giving you the right rows.
> SELECT ... FROM bigtable ORDER BY intprimarykey OFFSET pageno*100 LIMIT 100
This will get progressively slower as pageno goes up.
> SELECT ... FROM bigtable ORDER BY intprimarykey OFFSET 0 LIMIT 100
That should be plenty fast.
> cannot be used in PostgreSql at all for big tables.
Can't be used in any real database with any real complexity to its query either.
> Do you have any idea how to fix this ?
A standard workaround is to use some kind of sequential, or nearly so,
id field, and then use between on that field.
select * from table where idfield between x and x+100;