On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Jeff Gentry <jgentry@jimmy.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Hi there ...
>
> I recently discovered that there is a hard cap on the # of columns, being
> at 1600. I also understand that it is generally unfathomable that anyone
> would ever feel limited by that number ... however I've managed to bump
> into it myself and was looking to see if anyone had advice on how to
> manage the situation.
The generic solution without making too much work is to store similar
data types in an arrayed type in the db.