On Jan 9, 2008 12:20 PM, Steve Midgley <public@misuse.org> wrote:
> This is kludgy but you would have some kind of random number test at
> the start of the trigger - if it evals true once per every ten calls to
> the trigger (say), you'd cut your delete statements execs by about 10x
> and still periodically truncate every set of user rows fairly often. On
> average you'd have ~55 rows per user, never less than 50 and a few
> outliers with 60 or 70 rows before they get trimmed back down to 50..
> Seems more reliable than a cron job, and solves your problem of an ever
> growing table? You could adjust the random number test easily if you
> change your mind of the balance of size of table vs. # of delete
> statements down the road.
And, if you always through a limit 50 on the end of queries that
retrieve data, you could let it grow quite a bit more than 60 or 70...
Say 200. Then you could have it so that the random chopper function
only gets kicked off every 100th or so time.